Tuesday, May 21, 2024
HomePolicingMet firearms officer to face gross misconduct hearing for fatal shooting of...

Met firearms officer to face gross misconduct hearing for fatal shooting of Jermaine Baker in 2015, police watchdog says – Met Police to seek legal advice for police watchdog’s decision

The Metropolitan Police Service said that it is reviewing a decision by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) that misconduct proceedings should be brought against the firearms officer, known as W80, for the fatal shooting of Jermaine Baker eight years ago.

This comes after another firearms officer was charged with murder of Chris Kaba. Many firearms officers handed in their guns following the murder charge decision of the police watchdog against their colleague.

Chris Kaba

The Met chief Sir Mark Rowley called for reform in the legal system last week following latest developments. He said the progress being made to deliver change in the Met was “undermined by a system not set up to help officers succeed.”

He called for the policies and practices of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to be addressed, with a focus on the threshold for investigating police use of force and involvement in pursuits.

A statement from the Met regarding the latest decision of IOPC read: “W80 was part of a firearms team deployed to intercept a car containing a gang who were attempting to break a dangerous criminal out of custody. An imitation firearm was found in the car.”

Deputy Commissioner Lynne Owens said: “Today’s announcement follows protracted legal proceedings which we know have had a significant personal impact on Mr Baker’s family, the officer, their family and colleagues.

Jermaine Baker

“A public inquiry, concluded in July 2022, determined Mr Baker was lawfully killed. We disagreed with the IOPC decision to direct we hold a gross misconduct hearing for W80 and wrote in detail to the IOPC inviting it to review and reconsider its direction. We wrote to the IOPC more than a year ago and have today been informed of its decision.

“The IOPC has told us that the direction to bring proceedings stands and we must hold a misconduct hearing. We will review the IOPC decision and reasons and consider our next steps.

“We note that the IOPC has asked the MPS to consider asking another force to hold the hearing to provide additional reassurance about the independence of the process.

“We do not accept that our wider call for support and legal reassurance for armed officers impinges upon our independence, nor the impartiality of the misconduct hearing process.

“We will be seeking legal advice in light of the IOPC’s request.”

Case Background

On 11 December 2015, during a planned intelligence-led police operation to prevent an organised criminal gang breaking a dangerous criminal out of lawful custody, W80 shot and killed Jermaine Baker as he sat in a vehicle with others in Wood Green.

Mr Baker was not in possession of a firearm. An imitation firearm, in the style of a black Uzi sub-machine gun, was recovered from the rear of the car.

The shooting of Mr Baker was referred to the then Independent Police Complaints Commission (now the Independent Office for Police Conduct ) on the day of the incident.

On 16 December 2015, W80 was suspended from duty.

In June 2016, the criminal gang who took part in the plot was jailed for a total of 27 years.

In November 2016, the IPCC investigation concluded that W80 had a case to answer for gross misconduct for his use of lethal force.

In June 2017, the Crown Prosecution Service decided that W80 would not be charged with any criminal offence. W80’s suspension was lifted and the officer returned to work.

In March 2018, the IOPC recommended that W80 should face misconduct proceedings. The Met did not agree and did not follow the recommendation. The Met disagreed with the IOPC as to the correct self-defence test that applied in respect of police disciplinary proceedings. The Met contended that the criminal law test of self-defence applied. The IOPC maintained that the civil law test applied.

In May 2018, the IOPC directed the Met to start disciplinary proceedings. That direction was challenged by W80 in a judicial review claim that was taken all the way to the Supreme Court. At the first hearing of the case, the Divisional Court decided that the criminal law test applied. The Court of Appeal decided that neither the criminal law test nor the civil law test applied and that the test was simply the wording of the use of force standard in the police Standards of Professional Behaviour i.e. was the force used reasonable, proportionate and necessary in the circumstances. In its judgment on 5 July 2023, the Supreme Court decided that the civil law test applied. 

An independent public inquiry heard detailed evidence about the circumstances in which W80 shot and killed Mr Baker. In July 2022, the inquiry’s report was published and included a narrative conclusion. HHJ Clement Goldstone QC’s report found that “W80 shot Mr Baker because he honestly believed that Mr Baker posed a lethal threat and that it was reasonably necessary for him to shoot in order to defend himself” and that “Mr Baker was lawfully killed“.

In September 2022, the MPS wrote in detail to the IOPC inviting them to review and reconsider their direction.

On 29 September 2023, the IOPC maintained their direction that a gross misconduct hearing for W80 should be held.

RELATED ARTICLES

Stay Connected

34,507FansLike
14,825FollowersFollow
4,767FollowersFollow

Must Read